By by Rev. O. Hanson.
Read or Download A grammar of the Kachin language PDF
Similar language & grammar books
A booklet on language
Assuming no previous wisdom of the topic, this ebook offers an introductory account of themes coated in classes in phonology and phonetics. It supplies recognition to the elemental of speech construction in addition to to phonological description and research. The early chapters describe the organs of speech, survey the big variety of speech sounds that may be present in the world's languages, and clarify simple rules of phonological association.
This quantity deals an artificial method of language edition and language ideologies in multilingual groups. even though nearly all of the world’s speech groups are multilingual, a lot of sociolinguistics ignores this inner variety. This quantity fills this hole, investigating social and linguistic dimensions of edition and alter in multilingual groups.
This quantity is a range of twenty peer-reviewed articles first provided on the forty first annual Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), held on the collage of Ottawa in 2011. they're thematically associated through a huge suggestion of version throughout languages, dialects, audio system, time, linguistic contexts, and communicative events.
Extra resources for A grammar of the Kachin language
A second example is one we shall be examining at greater length in later chapters: varieties spoken in the north of England, unlike most other varieties of English, do not have the vowel / /. In these accents words such as up and but have /υ/, and blood and hood, dull and full rhyme. Differences of this sort can, as we have seen, be handled very easily by structural dialectology. In this case it is a simple matter to construct a (partial) diasystem for short vowels incorporating both southern and northern English English varieties: S, N // , ε ≈ æ ≈ S υ~ N υ ≈ ɒ // The schema shows that southern (S) and northern (N) varieties have the short vowels //, /ε/, /æ/ and /ɒ/ in common, but that all words that have /υ/ or / / in the south have /υ/ in the north.
And it is not able to show the degree to which a modern phoneme corresponds to one historical source rather than another. The above diasystem shows that some Middle English /o /s have become /u / in Norwich and others /u /, but not which or how many. A diasystem of this type, as Moulton pointed out, also has the unfortunate consequence of giving the impression that RP and Norwich do not, at least in these partial systems, have a single phonological unit in common. As Ernst Pulgram has written: ‘a diasystem that takes into account certain conditions which historical linguists, dialectologists, and the speakers will regard as indispensable and that then shows so little agreement between closely related dialects as to make them seem foreign to one another distorts the facts’ (1964: 67).
In so far as dialect variation is the result of waves of linguistic innovation spreading throughout a region, there is an intrinsic chronological dimension (in terms of ‘apparent’ time rather than real time, a distinction that is discussed in Chapter 10), a domain shared with comparativehistorical linguistics. However, in addition to these, there are other aspects of dialect geography which are uniquely associated with it or, if they are shared by some other branch of linguistics, grew out of it.
A grammar of the Kachin language by by Rev. O. Hanson.